From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: nth match Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 14:00:02 +0200 Message-ID: <447990C2.3020705@trash.net> References: <1148743183.2259.8.camel@murdegern.hindenburgdamm.example> <447874D3.3030901@trash.net> <1148750003.2259.32.camel@murdegern.hindenburgdamm.example> <4478903A.3080402@trash.net> <1148775230.9778.11.camel@murdegern.hindenburgdamm.example> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Torsten Luettgert In-Reply-To: <1148775230.9778.11.camel@murdegern.hindenburgdamm.example> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Torsten Luettgert wrote: > Hmm. So does this mean pom is (in)officially dead? > If new stuff doesn't go in there, and much of the old stuff is > removed, and the rest of it will be merged in the foreseeable future, > there's not much point in still maintaining it, right? No, it will still be used for patches that we don't want to put in mainline, but still have some interest in maintaining and for patches maintained by other people. > Personally, I'd regret that, because pom did at least supply > a fine framework for writing own matches and targets. It should be even easier to do this now since you can setup your own repository and update it without having to send patches to us, we just include the URL.