From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.17-rc5: the latest consensus libata resume fix Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 22:43:43 -0400 Message-ID: <447A5FDF.1080205@rtr.ca> References: <200605272245.30108.axboe@suse.de> <4478F681.8050607@garzik.org> <200605281128.00532.liml@rtr.ca> <20060528171424.GA12982@suse.de> <4479F487.5080507@garzik.org> <4479F76D.40506@rtr.ca> <447A03CC.50300@garzik.org> <20060528222832.GA26918@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rtr.ca ([64.26.128.89]:34446 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751117AbWE2Cnp (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 May 2006 22:43:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060528222832.GA26918@suse.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: Jeff Garzik , Linus Torvalds , "zhao, forrest" , Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe wrote: > > Mark is right, ATA_BUSY alone does _not_ work for me. I agree it's a > little odd based on the printk output, it must be a timing thing. I think maybe your drive is doing something like this ("B"==BUSY, "D"==DRQ): BBBDDBBBBBB Where the first couple of BBB last less than 10usec. Cheers