From: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
To: Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>
Cc: "Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>,
"Mike Galbraith" <efault@gmx.de>,
"Con Kolivas" <kernel@kolivas.org>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Kingsley Cheung" <kingsley@aurema.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Rene Herman" <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>,
"Herbert Poetzl" <herbert@13thfloor.at>,
"Kirill Korotaev" <dev@sw.ru>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] sched: Add CPU rate caps
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 09:12:22 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <447B7FD6.6020405@bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <447B64BF.4050806@vilain.net>
Sam Vilain wrote:
> Peter Williams wrote:
>
>> Yes, but not yet publicly available. I use quilt to keep the patch
>> series up to date and do the change as a relatively large series (30 or
>> so) to make it easier for me to cope with changes in the kernel. When I
>> do the next release I'll make a tar ball of the patch series available.
>>
>> Of course, if your eager to start right away I could make the
>> 2.6.17-rc4-mm1 one available?
>>
>>
>
> Well a piecewise patchset does make it a lot easier to see what's going
> on, especially if it's got descriptions of each patch along the way.
It's a bit light on descriptions at the moment :-( as I keep putting
that in the "do later" bin.
> I'd certainly be interested in having a look through the split out patch
> to see how namespaces and this advanced scheduling system might
> interoperate.
OK. I've tried very hard to make the scheduling code orthogonal to
everything else and it essentially separates out the scheduling within a
CPU from other issues e.g. load balancing. This separation is
sufficiently good for me to have merged PlugSched with an earlier
version of CKRM's CPU management module in a way that made each of
PlugSched's schedulers available within CKRM's infrastructure. (CKRM
have radically rewritten their CPU code since then and I haven't
bothered to keep up.)
The key point that I'm trying to make is that I would expect PlugSched
and namespaces to coexist without any problems. How it integrates with
the "advanced" scheduling system would depend on how that system alters
things such as load balancing and/or whether it goes for scheduling
outcomes at a higher level than the task.
I'm assuming that you're happy to wait for the next release? That will
improve the likelihood of descriptions in the patches :-).
Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-29 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-26 4:20 [RFC 0/5] sched: Add CPU rate caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26 4:20 ` [RFC 1/5] sched: Fix priority inheritence before CPU rate soft caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26 4:20 ` [RFC 2/5] sched: Add " Peter Williams
2006-05-26 10:48 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 11:15 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-26 11:17 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 11:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-26 13:55 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27 6:31 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-27 7:03 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-28 0:11 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-28 7:38 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-28 13:35 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-28 14:42 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-28 23:27 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-31 13:17 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-05-31 23:39 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-01 8:09 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-01 23:38 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02 1:35 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 4:20 ` [RFC 3/5] sched: Add CPU rate hard caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26 6:58 ` Kari Hurtta
2006-05-27 1:00 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 11:00 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 13:59 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 14:12 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 14:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-27 0:16 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27 9:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-28 2:09 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27 6:48 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-27 8:44 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-31 13:10 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-05-31 15:59 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-31 18:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-01 7:41 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-01 8:34 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-01 18:43 ` [ckrm-tech] " Chandra Seetharaman
2006-06-01 23:26 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02 2:02 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-06-02 3:21 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02 8:32 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-02 13:30 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02 18:58 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-02 23:49 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-03 4:59 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-02 19:06 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-06-03 0:04 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02 0:36 ` Con Kolivas
2006-06-02 2:03 ` [ckrm-tech] " Chandra Seetharaman
2006-06-02 5:55 ` [ckrm-tech] [RFC 3/5] " Peter Williams
2006-06-02 7:47 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-02 13:34 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-05 22:11 ` Sam Vilain
2006-06-06 8:24 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-06 9:13 ` Con Kolivas
2006-06-06 9:28 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-02 8:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-02 13:18 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02 14:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-03 0:08 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-03 6:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-03 11:03 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-06 11:26 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-06-02 7:34 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-02 21:23 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-01 23:47 ` Sam Vilain
2006-06-01 23:43 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-31 23:28 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-01 7:44 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-01 23:21 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 4:21 ` [RFC 4/5] sched: Add procfs interface for CPU rate soft caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26 4:21 ` [RFC 5/5] sched: Add procfs interface for CPU rate hard caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26 8:04 ` [RFC 0/5] sched: Add CPU rate caps Mike Galbraith
2006-05-26 16:11 ` Björn Steinbrink
2006-05-28 22:46 ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-28 23:30 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-29 3:09 ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-29 3:41 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-29 21:16 ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-29 23:12 ` Peter Williams [this message]
2006-05-30 2:07 ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-30 2:45 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-30 22:05 ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-30 23:22 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-30 23:25 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-05 23:56 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27 0:16 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 10:41 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-27 1:28 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27 1:42 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 11:09 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 14:00 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 11:29 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-27 1:40 ` Peter Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=447B7FD6.6020405@bigpond.net.au \
--to=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=kingsley@aurema.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rene.herman@keyaccess.nl \
--cc=sam@vilain.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.