All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Josef Sipek <jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	mike@halcrow.us, ezk@cs.sunysb.edu
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] remove racy sync_page?
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 16:44:57 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <447BE9E9.4000907@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060530055115.GD18626@filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>

Josef Sipek wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 07:34:09PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> ...
> 
>>Can we get rid of the whole thing, confusing memory barriers and all?
>>Nobody uses anything but the default sync_page
> 
> 
> I feel like I must say this: there are some file systems that live
> outside the kernel (at least for now) that do _NOT_ use the default
> sync_page. All the stackable file systems that are based on FiST [1],
> such as Unionfs [2] and eCryptfs (currently in -mm) [3] (respective
> authors CC'd). As an example, Unionfs must decide which lower file
> system page to sync (since it may have several to chose from).

OK, noted. Thanks. Luckily for them it looks like sync_page might
stay for other reasons (eg. raid) ;)

Any good reasons they are not in the tree?

> 
> Josef "Jeff" Sipek.
> 
> [1] http://www.filesystems.org
> [2] http://unionfs.filesystems.org
> [3] http://ecryptfs.sourceforge.net



-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Josef Sipek <jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	mike@halcrow.us, ezk@cs.sunysb.edu
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] remove racy sync_page?
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 16:44:57 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <447BE9E9.4000907@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060530055115.GD18626@filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>

Josef Sipek wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 07:34:09PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> ...
> 
>>Can we get rid of the whole thing, confusing memory barriers and all?
>>Nobody uses anything but the default sync_page
> 
> 
> I feel like I must say this: there are some file systems that live
> outside the kernel (at least for now) that do _NOT_ use the default
> sync_page. All the stackable file systems that are based on FiST [1],
> such as Unionfs [2] and eCryptfs (currently in -mm) [3] (respective
> authors CC'd). As an example, Unionfs must decide which lower file
> system page to sync (since it may have several to chose from).

OK, noted. Thanks. Luckily for them it looks like sync_page might
stay for other reasons (eg. raid) ;)

Any good reasons they are not in the tree?

> 
> Josef "Jeff" Sipek.
> 
> [1] http://www.filesystems.org
> [2] http://unionfs.filesystems.org
> [3] http://ecryptfs.sourceforge.net



-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-30  6:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 118+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-29  9:34 [rfc][patch] remove racy sync_page? Nick Piggin
2006-05-29 19:15 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-29 19:15   ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-30  0:08   ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-30  0:08     ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-30  1:32     ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-30  1:32       ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-30  2:54       ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-30  2:54         ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-30  3:14         ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-30  3:14           ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-30  4:13           ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-30  4:13             ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-30  9:05           ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-30  9:05             ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-31 13:43             ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31 13:43               ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31 15:09               ` Hugh Dickins
2006-05-31 15:09                 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-05-31 15:22                 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31 15:22                   ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31 17:51                   ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-31 17:51                     ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-31 17:50               ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-31 17:50                 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-30  4:20         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-30  4:20           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-30  5:07           ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-30  5:07             ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-30  5:21             ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-30  5:21               ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-30  6:12               ` Neil Brown
2006-05-30  6:12                 ` Neil Brown
2006-05-30  7:10                 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-30  7:10                   ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31  4:34                   ` Neil Brown
2006-05-31  4:34                     ` Neil Brown
2006-05-30  8:24               ` Nikita Danilov
2006-05-30  8:24                 ` Nikita Danilov
2006-05-30 17:55               ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-30 17:55                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-31  0:32                 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31  0:32                   ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31  0:56                   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-31  0:56                     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-31  1:33                     ` Mark Lord
2006-05-31  1:33                       ` Mark Lord
2006-05-31  6:11                       ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-31  6:11                         ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-31 12:55                         ` Mark Lord
2006-05-31 12:55                           ` Mark Lord
2006-05-31 13:02                           ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-31 13:02                             ` Jens Axboe
2006-06-01 13:19                           ` NCQ performance (was Re: [rfc][patch] remove racy sync_page?) Jens Axboe
2006-06-01 13:19                             ` Jens Axboe
2006-06-01 14:56                             ` Avi Kivity
2006-06-01 14:56                               ` Avi Kivity
2006-06-01 15:03                               ` Jens Axboe
2006-06-01 15:03                                 ` Jens Axboe
2006-06-01 18:04                                 ` Jens Axboe
2006-06-01 18:04                                   ` Jens Axboe
2006-06-05  5:30                                   ` Avi Kivity
2006-06-05  5:30                                     ` Avi Kivity
2006-06-05  7:59                                     ` Jens Axboe
2006-06-05  7:59                                       ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-31 12:31                     ` [rfc][patch] remove racy sync_page? Helge Hafting
2006-05-31 12:31                       ` Helge Hafting
2006-05-31 12:36                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-05-31 12:36                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-05-31 13:29                     ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31 13:29                       ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31 13:41                       ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-31 13:41                         ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-31 13:54                         ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31 13:54                           ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31 14:43                       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-31 14:43                         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-31 14:57                         ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31 14:57                           ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31 15:13                           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-31 15:13                             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-31 15:33                             ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31 15:57                               ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-31 16:12                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-31 16:26                                   ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31 16:19                                 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31 16:22                                   ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31 16:41                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-06-02  2:34                                       ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-02  2:39                                         ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31 16:39                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-06-02  2:21                                     ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31 23:59                                   ` Neil Brown
2006-05-31 15:09                         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-31 15:09                           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-31 18:13                           ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-31 18:13                             ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-31 18:26                             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-31 18:26                               ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-30  5:36             ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-30 18:31               ` Hugh Dickins
2006-05-30 18:31                 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-05-31  0:21                 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31  0:21                   ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-31  3:06                   ` Hugh Dickins
2006-05-31  3:06                     ` Hugh Dickins
2006-05-31 14:30                     ` Hugh Dickins
2006-05-31 14:30                       ` Hugh Dickins
2006-05-31 17:56                     ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-31 17:56                       ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-30  5:51 ` Josef Sipek
2006-05-30  5:51   ` Josef Sipek
2006-05-30  6:44   ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2006-05-30  6:44     ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-30  6:50     ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-30  6:50       ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-30 13:12     ` Josef Sipek
2006-05-30 13:12       ` Josef Sipek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=447BE9E9.4000907@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=ezk@cs.sunysb.edu \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mason@suse.com \
    --cc=mike@halcrow.us \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.