From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Courtier-Dutton Subject: Re: dB gain Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:59:58 +0100 Message-ID: <447C962E.3010103@superbug.co.uk> References: <4478A290.80702@superbug.co.uk> <447B0A19.2050408@superbug.co.uk> <447B308E.2050502@superbug.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.88]) by alsa.jcu.cz (ALSA's E-mail Delivery System) with ESMTP id 65014150 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 21:00:02 +0200 (MEST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jaroslav Kysela Cc: Takashi Iwai , ALSA development List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org So, from what I can see, there have been no real reasons why I should not commit my db gain code now. Except for the actual name of the ioctl function. Should I also use a different number? Lets take a vote: 1) SNDRV_CTL_IOCTL_MISC = _IOR('U', 0x22, struct snd_ctl_misc), 2) SNDRV_CTL_IOCTL_INFO2 = _IOR('U', 0x22, struct snd_ctl_info2), 3) SNDRV_CTL_IOCTL_TLV = _IOR('U', 0x22, struct snd_ctl_tlv), 4) Something else...suggest. Once we decide, I will commit it. James