From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: ipv4options still broken (posted prev w/ no reply)... Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 01:05:12 +0200 Message-ID: <447CCFA8.8090505@trash.net> References: <1149011224.28886.14.camel@mbox> <447C9B8A.20304@trash.net> <1149023782.28886.28.camel@mbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Cody Tubbs In-Reply-To: <1149023782.28886.28.camel@mbox> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Cody Tubbs wrote: > I'm not going to indulge in 101 stuff regarding loose/strict source > attacks, google enjoys 101 much more. > > http://www.spirit.com/Network/net0300.html (section: Source Route) > > http://seclists.org/lists/pen-test/2003/May/0023.html Which system accepts source route options nowadays? You most likely have more serious problems than this.