From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [NETFILTER 05/17]: recent match: replace by rewritten version Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 02:48:03 +0200 Message-ID: <447CE7C3.7000400@trash.net> References: <20060529223404.24834.30808.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20060529223413.24834.97896.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20060530131150.GV8588@kenobi.snowman.net> <447C45C3.5000502@trash.net> <20060530181018.GW8588@kenobi.snowman.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, davem@davemloft.net Return-path: To: Stephen Frost In-Reply-To: <20060530181018.GW8588@kenobi.snowman.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Stephen Frost wrote: > Great, thanks. I've now reviewed the version in DaveM's net-2.6.18 git > tree and it looks good to me. I'll try and do some real-world testing > on it this weekend. I'm very curious if these changes will allow for > larger lists than was previously possible. Thanks Stephen, I appreciate your help getting rid of the problem. It should perform a lot better with large lists, the closed hash with linear probing looked horribly inefficient.