From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: ipv4options still broken (posted prev w/ no reply)...
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:55:52 +0200
Message-ID: <447DA068.1090507@trash.net>
References: <1149033568.27117@www.broadwayinternet.com>
	<447CD93F.9070103@trash.net> <20060531045445.GA8333@oknodo.bof.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: tubbs@wispdirect.com, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
To: Patrick Schaaf <bof@bof.de>
In-Reply-To: <20060531045445.GA8333@oknodo.bof.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

Patrick Schaaf wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 01:46:07AM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
> Patrick, at the risk of annoying you some more: the attitude you showed
> in this thread, is very annoying in itself. While your work on netfilter
> is really deeply appreciated, slight-of-hand security evaluations like
> you showed here, are not.
> 
> Maybe you just need to get some more sleep. I hope so.

I don't like beeing lectured. Linux drops all source route
options anyway, so this entire discussion is absolutely
pointless.