From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: "Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator,
Great Lakes Internet" <support8@greatlakes.net>
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: [LARTC] iptables CLASSIFY and MARK not working?
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 18:22:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <447F306F.3080708@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0633E0EDB4F25F43A2D7179CA11FAFAB255414@xavier.staff.greatlakes.net>
Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet wrote:
> However, this still does not work:
>
> Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 812K packets, 441M bytes)
> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
> destination
> 2071 129K CLASSIFY all -- * br1 0.0.0.0/0
> 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match 0x1fe CLASSIFY set 1c7:0
> 2 521 CLASSIFY all -- * br1 0.0.0.0/0
> 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match 0x1ff CLASSIFY set 1c8:0
> 0 0 CLASSIFY all -- * br1 0.0.0.0/0
> 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match 0x200 CLASSIFY set 1c9:0
> 2760 4060K CLASSIFY all -- * wivl4 0.0.0.0/0
> 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match 0x1fe CLASSIFY set 1db:0
> 3 500 CLASSIFY all -- * wivl4 0.0.0.0/0
> 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match 0x1ff CLASSIFY set 1dc:0
> 0 0 CLASSIFY all -- * wivl4 0.0.0.0/0
> 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match 0x200 CLASSIFY set 1dd:0
>
>
> wireless-r1 bwlimit # tc -s qdisc show dev wivl4
> qdisc hfsc 5: default 2
> Sent 8554815 bytes 7797 pkt (dropped 6, overlimits 13 requeues 0)
> rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> qdisc sfq 1db: parent 5:1fe limit 128p quantum 1514b
> Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> qdisc sfq 1dc: parent 5:1ff limit 128p quantum 1514b
> Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> qdisc sfq 1dd: parent 5:200 limit 128p quantum 1514b
> Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
I already told you why this doesn't work, you have to classify to
the _classes_, not the qdiscs.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: "Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator,
Great Lakes Internet" <support8@greatlakes.net>
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: iptables CLASSIFY and MARK not working?
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 20:22:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <447F306F.3080708@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0633E0EDB4F25F43A2D7179CA11FAFAB255414@xavier.staff.greatlakes.net>
Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet wrote:
> However, this still does not work:
>
> Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 812K packets, 441M bytes)
> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
> destination
> 2071 129K CLASSIFY all -- * br1 0.0.0.0/0
> 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match 0x1fe CLASSIFY set 1c7:0
> 2 521 CLASSIFY all -- * br1 0.0.0.0/0
> 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match 0x1ff CLASSIFY set 1c8:0
> 0 0 CLASSIFY all -- * br1 0.0.0.0/0
> 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match 0x200 CLASSIFY set 1c9:0
> 2760 4060K CLASSIFY all -- * wivl4 0.0.0.0/0
> 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match 0x1fe CLASSIFY set 1db:0
> 3 500 CLASSIFY all -- * wivl4 0.0.0.0/0
> 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match 0x1ff CLASSIFY set 1dc:0
> 0 0 CLASSIFY all -- * wivl4 0.0.0.0/0
> 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match 0x200 CLASSIFY set 1dd:0
>
>
> wireless-r1 bwlimit # tc -s qdisc show dev wivl4
> qdisc hfsc 5: default 2
> Sent 8554815 bytes 7797 pkt (dropped 6, overlimits 13 requeues 0)
> rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> qdisc sfq 1db: parent 5:1fe limit 128p quantum 1514b
> Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> qdisc sfq 1dc: parent 5:1ff limit 128p quantum 1514b
> Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> qdisc sfq 1dd: parent 5:200 limit 128p quantum 1514b
> Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
I already told you why this doesn't work, you have to classify to
the _classes_, not the qdiscs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-01 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-19 14:31 [LARTC] iptables CLASSIFY and MARK not working? Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet
2006-05-19 17:31 ` Andreas Unterkircher
2006-05-19 19:26 ` Jody Shumaker
2006-05-22 21:56 ` Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet
2006-05-23 4:32 ` Jody Shumaker
2006-05-30 19:25 ` Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet
2006-05-30 19:49 ` Jason Boxman
2006-05-30 20:12 ` Luciano Ruete
2006-05-30 20:13 ` Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet
2006-05-30 20:19 ` Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet
2006-05-30 20:25 ` Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet
2006-06-01 18:13 ` Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet
2006-06-01 18:22 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2006-06-01 18:22 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-01 18:49 ` [LARTC] " Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet
2006-06-01 18:49 ` Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet
2006-06-01 19:09 ` [LARTC] " Patrick McHardy
2006-06-01 19:09 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-01 19:38 ` Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet
2006-06-01 19:38 ` Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet
2006-06-01 19:44 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-01 19:44 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-01 19:58 ` [LARTC] " Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet
2006-06-01 19:58 ` Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet
2006-06-01 20:01 ` [LARTC] " Patrick McHardy
2006-06-01 20:01 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-01 20:09 ` Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet
2006-06-01 20:09 ` Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet
2006-06-01 20:10 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-01 20:10 ` Patrick McHardy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-03 16:43 Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet
2006-06-08 7:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-08 7:41 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=447F306F.3080708@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=support8@greatlakes.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.