All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>
To: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
Cc: sekharan@us.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Srivatsa <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
	ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, balbir@in.ibm.com,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kingsley Cheung <kingsley@aurema.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC 3/5] sched: Add CPU rate hard caps
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 11:47:09 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <447FECFD.8000602@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <447FD2E1.7060605@bigpond.net.au>

>>>> Sure! You can check OpenVZ project (http://openvz.org) for example 
>>>> of required resource management. BTW, I must agree with other people 
>>>> here who noticed that per-process resource management is really 
>>>> useless and hard to use :(
>>
>>
>> I totally agree.
> 
> 
> "nice" seems to be doing quite nicely :-)
I'm sorry, but nice never looked "nice" to me.
Have you ever tried to "nice" apache server which spawns 500 
processes/threads on a loaded machine?
With nice you _can't_ impose limits or priority on the whole "apache".
The more apaches you have the more useless their priorites and nices are...

> To me this capping functionality is a similar functionality to that 
> provided by "nice" and all that's needed to make it useful is a command 
> (similar to "nice") that runs tasks with caps applied.  To that end I've 
> written a small script (attached) that does this.  As this is something 
> that a user might like to combine with "nice" the command has an option 
> for setting "nice" as well as caps.
> 
> Usage:
>         withcap [options] command [arguments ...]
>         withcap -h
> Options:
>         [-c <CPU rate soft cap>]
>         [-C <CPU rate hard cap>]
>         [-n <nice value>]
> 
>         -c Set CPU usage rate soft cap
>         -C Set CPU usage rate hard cap
>         -n Set nice value
>         -h Display this help

the same for this. you can't limit a _user_, only his processes.
Today I have 1 task and 20% limit is ok, tomorrow I have 10 tasks and 
this 20% limits changes nothing in the system.

Kirill

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-02  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-26  4:20 [RFC 0/5] sched: Add CPU rate caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26  4:20 ` [RFC 1/5] sched: Fix priority inheritence before CPU rate soft caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26  4:20 ` [RFC 2/5] sched: Add " Peter Williams
2006-05-26 10:48   ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 11:15     ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-26 11:17       ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 11:30         ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-26 13:55     ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27  6:31   ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-27  7:03     ` Peter Williams
2006-05-28  0:11       ` Peter Williams
2006-05-28  7:38         ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-28 13:35           ` Peter Williams
2006-05-28 14:42             ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-28 23:27               ` Peter Williams
2006-05-31 13:17                 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-05-31 23:39                   ` Peter Williams
2006-06-01  8:09                     ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-01 23:38                       ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02  1:35                         ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26  4:20 ` [RFC 3/5] sched: Add CPU rate hard caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26  6:58   ` Kari Hurtta
2006-05-27  1:00     ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 11:00   ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 13:59     ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 14:12       ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 14:23       ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-27  0:16         ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27  9:28           ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-28  2:09             ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27  6:48   ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-27  8:44     ` Peter Williams
2006-05-31 13:10       ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-05-31 15:59         ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-31 18:09           ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-01  7:41           ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-01  8:34             ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-01 18:43               ` [ckrm-tech] " Chandra Seetharaman
2006-06-01 23:26                 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02  2:02                   ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-06-02  3:21                     ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02  8:32                       ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-02 13:30                         ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02 18:58                           ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-02 23:49                             ` Peter Williams
2006-06-03  4:59                               ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-02 19:06                       ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-06-03  0:04                         ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02  0:36                 ` Con Kolivas
2006-06-02  2:03                   ` [ckrm-tech] " Chandra Seetharaman
2006-06-02  5:55                 ` [ckrm-tech] [RFC 3/5] " Peter Williams
2006-06-02  7:47                   ` Kirill Korotaev [this message]
2006-06-02 13:34                     ` Peter Williams
2006-06-05 22:11                     ` Sam Vilain
2006-06-06  8:24                       ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-06  9:13                         ` Con Kolivas
2006-06-06  9:28                           ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-02  8:46                   ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-02 13:18                     ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02 14:47                       ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-03  0:08                         ` Peter Williams
2006-06-03  6:02                           ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-03 11:03                             ` Peter Williams
2006-06-06 11:26                         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-06-02  7:34                 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-02 21:23                   ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-01 23:47               ` Sam Vilain
2006-06-01 23:43           ` Peter Williams
2006-05-31 23:28         ` Peter Williams
2006-06-01  7:44           ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-01 23:21             ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26  4:21 ` [RFC 4/5] sched: Add procfs interface for CPU rate soft caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26  4:21 ` [RFC 5/5] sched: Add procfs interface for CPU rate hard caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26  8:04 ` [RFC 0/5] sched: Add CPU rate caps Mike Galbraith
2006-05-26 16:11   ` Björn Steinbrink
2006-05-28 22:46     ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-28 23:30       ` Peter Williams
2006-05-29  3:09         ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-29  3:41           ` Peter Williams
2006-05-29 21:16             ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-29 23:12               ` Peter Williams
2006-05-30  2:07                 ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-30  2:45                   ` Peter Williams
2006-05-30 22:05                     ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-30 23:22                       ` Peter Williams
2006-05-30 23:25                       ` Peter Williams
2006-06-05 23:56                       ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27  0:16   ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 10:41 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-27  1:28   ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27  1:42     ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 11:09 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 14:00   ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 11:29 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-27  1:40   ` Peter Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=447FECFD.8000602@openvz.org \
    --to=dev@openvz.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=kingsley@aurema.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
    --cc=rene.herman@keyaccess.nl \
    --cc=sam@vilain.net \
    --cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.