From: abraham.manu@gmail.com (Manu Abraham)
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [lm-sensors] [v4l-dvb-maintainer] Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: allow
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 11:38:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44802319.4050609@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi All,
Nathan Lutchansky wrote:
>
> At the moment, anyway. It will become more and more necessary as the
> number of different I2C sensor chips on the market increases. V4L/DVB has
> already hit this problem in a big way.
>
>
DVB doesn't probe for i2c devices. The DVB adapter, ie the card knows
what devices that are present and works under that assumption.
Earlier DVB had the problem with probing. ie a different device is found
at the expected location of another device(In the case of probing) and
this device doesn't like to be fiddled around with. And "lo" we have a
perfect freeze.
After many such cases, DVB no longer probes for i2c devices (we now
longer have anymore i2c issues)
V4L on the other hand probes for all devices. This is IMHO wrong, due to
(1) When the probe list grows long, it takes longer time for the probe
to succeed (V4L guys themselves would agree to the fact that they have
seen probes in the order of ~30 minutes ! Yuck)
(2) Probing wrong devices
So in any case probing can never be right, unless the card information
is passed to the i2c core. But in that sense it is no longer a probe. It
is indeed just an attach method. In that case, it makes no sense to make
i2c core go around in circles.
The proper way to handle this, is that only the right device is
attached. Rather than making i2c to do this, subsystems should be
handling this.
my 2 cents
Manu
next reply other threads:[~2006-06-02 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-02 11:38 Manu Abraham [this message]
2006-06-02 12:05 ` [lm-sensors] [v4l-dvb-maintainer] Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: allow Hans Verkuil
2006-06-02 12:05 ` Hans Verkuil
2006-06-02 12:17 ` Manu Abraham
2006-06-02 12:23 ` Manu Abraham
2006-06-02 12:29 ` Hans Verkuil
2006-06-02 12:42 ` Manu Abraham
2006-06-02 13:20 ` Hans Verkuil
2006-06-03 2:33 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2006-06-03 9:52 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2006-06-03 11:21 ` Manu Abraham
2006-06-06 12:00 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2006-06-06 12:04 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2006-06-06 12:38 ` Manu Abraham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44802319.4050609@gmail.com \
--to=abraham.manu@gmail.com \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.