From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@pandora.be>
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Bridge netfilter defered hooks
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:57:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <448051F3.1070509@trash.net> (raw)
Bart, I would like to get another discussion going about what
to do about the physdev match and the hook deferal done by
bridge netfilter. The lastest addition to the list of things
it breaks is qdisc classification on the bridge device using
MARK or CLASSIFY.
The main question is if the feature that causes all this trouble
(output port matching within iptables) really is useful at all.
It is not needed for filtering based on the output port of a
bridge, this can be done using ebtables and iptables+mark if
necessary. The only thing I can see that can't be done using
ebtables is NAT based on the output port. I somehow doubt that
this is really worth all the trouble, google show about 20 hits
for "-t nat" "-m physdev" "--physdev-out", half of which appear
to be examples in some magazines. So my prefered solution would
be to deprecate it and remove it in a couple of month.
For a short-term solution we should also think about whether
the hook deferal really needs to be done by default or if the
few users that appear to be using this can't just enable it
manually.
next reply other threads:[~2006-06-02 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-02 14:57 Patrick McHardy [this message]
2006-06-02 17:00 ` Bridge netfilter defered hooks Bart De Schuymer
2006-06-02 17:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-02 20:10 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2006-06-08 7:15 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-08 20:47 ` Martijn Lievaart
2006-06-08 21:40 ` Simon Lodal
2006-06-08 22:17 ` Martijn Lievaart
2006-06-08 23:43 ` Philip Craig
2006-06-19 16:01 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-19 15:59 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-20 21:26 ` Martijn Lievaart
2006-06-20 21:44 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=448051F3.1070509@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=bdschuym@pandora.be \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.