From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
To: Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>
Cc: Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
sekharan@us.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Srivatsa <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, balbir@in.ibm.com,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kingsley Cheung <kingsley@aurema.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC 3/5] sched: Add CPU rate hard caps
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 12:24:42 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44853BCA.4010009@sw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4484ABF9.50503@vilain.net>
>>I'm sorry, but nice never looked "nice" to me.
>>Have you ever tried to "nice" apache server which spawns 500
>>processes/threads on a loaded machine?
>>With nice you _can't_ impose limits or priority on the whole "apache".
>>The more apaches you have the more useless their priorites and nices are...
>>
>>
>
>
> Yes but interactive admin processes will still get a large bonus
> relative to the apache processes so you can still log in and kill the
> apache storm off even with very large loads.
And how do you plan to manage it: to log in every time when apache works
too much and kill processes? The managabiliy of such solutions sucks..
Kirill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-06 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-26 4:20 [RFC 0/5] sched: Add CPU rate caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26 4:20 ` [RFC 1/5] sched: Fix priority inheritence before CPU rate soft caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26 4:20 ` [RFC 2/5] sched: Add " Peter Williams
2006-05-26 10:48 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 11:15 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-26 11:17 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 11:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-26 13:55 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27 6:31 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-27 7:03 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-28 0:11 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-28 7:38 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-28 13:35 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-28 14:42 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-28 23:27 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-31 13:17 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-05-31 23:39 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-01 8:09 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-01 23:38 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02 1:35 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 4:20 ` [RFC 3/5] sched: Add CPU rate hard caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26 6:58 ` Kari Hurtta
2006-05-27 1:00 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 11:00 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 13:59 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 14:12 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 14:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-27 0:16 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27 9:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-28 2:09 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27 6:48 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-27 8:44 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-31 13:10 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-05-31 15:59 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-31 18:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-01 7:41 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-01 8:34 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-01 18:43 ` [ckrm-tech] " Chandra Seetharaman
2006-06-01 23:26 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02 2:02 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-06-02 3:21 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02 8:32 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-02 13:30 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02 18:58 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-02 23:49 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-03 4:59 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-02 19:06 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-06-03 0:04 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02 0:36 ` Con Kolivas
2006-06-02 2:03 ` [ckrm-tech] " Chandra Seetharaman
2006-06-02 5:55 ` [ckrm-tech] [RFC 3/5] " Peter Williams
2006-06-02 7:47 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-02 13:34 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-05 22:11 ` Sam Vilain
2006-06-06 8:24 ` Kirill Korotaev [this message]
2006-06-06 9:13 ` Con Kolivas
2006-06-06 9:28 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-02 8:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-02 13:18 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-02 14:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-03 0:08 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-03 6:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-03 11:03 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-06 11:26 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-06-02 7:34 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-02 21:23 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-01 23:47 ` Sam Vilain
2006-06-01 23:43 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-31 23:28 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-01 7:44 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-01 23:21 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 4:21 ` [RFC 4/5] sched: Add procfs interface for CPU rate soft caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26 4:21 ` [RFC 5/5] sched: Add procfs interface for CPU rate hard caps Peter Williams
2006-05-26 8:04 ` [RFC 0/5] sched: Add CPU rate caps Mike Galbraith
2006-05-26 16:11 ` Björn Steinbrink
2006-05-28 22:46 ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-28 23:30 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-29 3:09 ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-29 3:41 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-29 21:16 ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-29 23:12 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-30 2:07 ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-30 2:45 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-30 22:05 ` Sam Vilain
2006-05-30 23:22 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-30 23:25 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-05 23:56 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27 0:16 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 10:41 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-27 1:28 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-27 1:42 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 11:09 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-26 14:00 ` Peter Williams
2006-05-26 11:29 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-27 1:40 ` Peter Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44853BCA.4010009@sw.ru \
--to=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=dev@openvz.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=kingsley@aurema.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=rene.herman@keyaccess.nl \
--cc=sam@vilain.net \
--cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.