From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751401AbWFGA0f (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 20:26:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751402AbWFGA0f (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 20:26:35 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:21939 "EHLO mail.goop.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751401AbWFGA0e (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 20:26:34 -0400 Message-ID: <44861D37.7050301@goop.org> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 17:26:31 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nigel Cunningham CC: Andrew Morton , Don Zickus , ak@suse.de, shaohua.li@intel.com, miles.lane@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.17-rc5-mm2] crash when doing second suspend: BUG in arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c:174 References: <4480C102.3060400@goop.org> <200606070938.34927.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> <44861899.1040506@goop.org> <200606071013.53490.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> In-Reply-To: <200606071013.53490.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nigel Cunningham wrote: > It's probably safter to say "In the suspend/resume case, they may well be." > It's not inconceivable that a system could be suspended, a faulty cpu > replaced with another, and the system resumed. Hotplugging ought to handle > that nicely. > I think, in general, changing the hardware configuration of the system while its suspend is not supported. But perhaps someone who actually knows about this PM stuff has a more authoritative view... J