From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>,
dzickus@redhat.com, ak@suse.de, shaohua.li@intel.com,
miles.lane@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.17-rc5-mm2] crash when doing second suspend: BUG in arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c:174
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 17:29:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44861DE0.6010106@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060606172410.b901950e.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> It all depends on what we mean by "per-cpu state". If we were to remember
> that "CPU 7 needs 0x1234 in register 44" then that would be wrong. But
> remembering some high-level functional thing like "CPU 7 needs to run the
> NMI watchdog" is fine. The CPU bringup code can work out whether that is
> possible, and how to do it.
>
>
But all the performance counter stuff is very model-specific. I don't
think there's any abstraction which would allow us to say "CPU 7 is
measuring branch misprediction stalls in pipeline 2" in any way other
than "needs 0x1234 in register 44".
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-07 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-02 22:51 [2.6.17-rc5-mm2] crash when doing second suspend: BUG in arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c:174 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-04 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-06-05 7:21 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-05 7:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-05 7:48 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-05 7:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-05 8:35 ` Miles Lane
2006-06-06 6:44 ` Shaohua Li
2006-06-06 14:17 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-06 14:18 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-06 21:45 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-06 22:15 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-06 23:05 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-06 23:22 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-06 23:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-06 23:32 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-06 23:42 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-08 20:11 ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-06 23:38 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07 0:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-07 0:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07 0:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-07 0:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2006-06-07 0:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07 0:33 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-07 0:40 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07 0:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-07 0:33 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07 0:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-08 20:13 ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-08 12:45 ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-06 23:34 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-06 23:55 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-07 0:04 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-07 0:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07 0:42 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-07 0:50 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07 3:29 ` [linux-pm] " David Brownell
2006-06-07 9:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-06-08 20:27 ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-06 16:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-06 16:51 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-07 2:49 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-07 16:33 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-07 17:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-07 17:50 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-07 18:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44861DE0.6010106@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
--cc=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.