All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem authenticating using WPA with bcm43xx-softmac
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 09:01:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4486F866.9040901@errno.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1149695470.3925.7.camel@johannes>

Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 10:47 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> 
>> I have a little more information on what is happening. 
> 
> Great.
> 
>> In IEEE Std 802.11i-2004, which defines the 
>> WPA protocol, Figure 11a shows the sequence of exchanges needed to associate. Both bcm43xx-softmac 
>> and ndiswrapper go through the "Open System Authentication" process. 
> 
> Right, you always have to do that.
> 
>> Where they seem to diverge is 
>> in the STA's "Association Request (Security Parameters)" step. With ndiswrapper, the AP responds 
>> with a WPA EAPOL-Key message; whereas with softmac, the AP sends back the "invalid pairwise cipher 
>> message" and rejects the association.
> 
> Interesting. That's strange.
> 
>> Can anyone point to a reference that states what the content of the Association Request should be to 
>> get the AP to respond with the EAPOL-Key message? Unfortunately, I have no possibility of 
>> implementing a sniffer to see what a "correct" message contains.
> 
> Well, it should be shown in the 802.11i spec too.

Beware of the order of IE's in the management frames; some AP's are
touchy about this.

	Sam


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-06-07 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-06 19:24 Problem authenticating using WPA with bcm43xx-softmac Larry Finger
2006-06-07 12:10 ` Johannes Berg
2006-06-07 15:47   ` Larry Finger
2006-06-07 15:51     ` Johannes Berg
2006-06-07 15:57       ` Johannes Berg
2006-06-07 17:29         ` Dan Williams
2006-06-07 18:12           ` Larry Finger
2006-06-07 19:36             ` Dan Williams
2006-06-07 19:46               ` Larry Finger
2006-06-09 11:44             ` Johannes Berg
2006-06-09 15:31               ` Larry Finger
2006-06-09 15:34                 ` Johannes Berg
2006-06-09 16:24                   ` Larry Finger
2006-06-12  1:11                   ` Larry Finger
2006-06-13  8:40                     ` Johannes Berg
2006-06-07 16:01       ` Sam Leffler [this message]
2006-06-07 16:06         ` Johannes Berg
2006-06-07 16:30           ` Larry Finger
2006-06-07 17:07           ` Larry Finger
2006-06-07 16:09         ` Larry Finger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4486F866.9040901@errno.com \
    --to=sam@errno.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.