Re: Negating limit

[Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>]

Sven Anders wrote:
> Here is a patch to allow a negated "limit", so we can match above and below the
> limit.
> 
> It adds a new "flags" variable after the burst. I'm not sure, if I can add it
> after the "*master" variable, so I added it here.
> Does this preserve compatibility, because anything after is only used by the kernel?

No, unfortunately there is no way to add a new variable to that struct
without breaking compatibility. You could add a new revision, but I
would like to think about Massimiliano Hofer's patch before that,
if we do something like that we can get rid of the "master" pointer
with the new revision.