From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: EHEA: Is there a size limit below 80K for patches? Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 10:48:36 -0400 Message-ID: <448838C4.2050603@garzik.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Heiko J Schick , Jan-Bernd Themann , Marcus Eder , netdev , ossthema@de.ibm.com, Thomas OS Klein Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:16332 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964852AbWFHOsk (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:48:40 -0400 To: Christoph Raisch In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Christoph Raisch wrote: > well, now I'm confused... > 2 People, two opinions.... > > > Here's a URL for a complete tarball, "sharing" the download location with > our other driver. > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/ibmehcad/ehea_EHEA_0002.tgz > > We're waiting for a sourceforge project now since 9 days to put out a tgz, > and it looks like many other people get upset right now by their response > time. > > So what's the "right"/preferred way to proceed? Patches and new drivers should always go to the mailing list...... except for the case where they are too big to be posted to the mailing list. For that special case, a URL to a patch should be posted. Jeff