From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Martijn Lievaart <m@rtij.nl>
Subject: Re: Bridge netfilter defered hooks
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:17:57 +0200
Message-ID: <4488A215.5030305@rtij.nl>
References: <448051F3.1070509@trash.net>
	<4487CEA8.8060701@trash.net>	<44888CD7.8090601@rtij.nl>
	<200606082340.41755.simonl@parknet.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
To: Simon Lodal <simonl@parknet.dk>
In-Reply-To: <200606082340.41755.simonl@parknet.dk>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

Simon Lodal wrote:

>Why not define the mark size at compile time, in case you need more bits?
>  
>

Because that probably would cause the skb to grow beyond a cache line, 
though I'm nowhere an expert on these things. Opinions?

M4