David F Barrera wrote:
> June 12, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
>
> changeset:   10326:34ff26fb2240
> tag:         tip
> user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
> date:        Mon Jun 12 06:01:32 2006 +0100
> summary:     [HVM][VMX] Fix error-detection inline asm code. Zero 
> word-sized
>
> x86_32 (no PAE support)
>
> * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235(512MB RAM)
> * Builds and boots without problems
> * Ran xm-test on all boxes
>
> ISSUES:
>
> Note: these problems are due to the way xm-test works, rather than xen 
> problems.
> * Bugzilla 637  NEW  xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
> * Bugzilla 639  NEW  xm-test multiple test failures -
>
> x86_32 (PAE)
>
> * SLES 9 SP2 on xSeries 335 and HS20 Blade 8843and FC4 on IBM xSeries 
> 335s                     * Builds and boots without problems
> * Ran xm-test on all boxes
>
> ISSUES:
> * Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
> * Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures - 
> XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
>
> x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
>
> * Builds and boots without problems
> * Ran xm-test on all boxes
>
> ISSUES:
>
> XM-TEST Results :
>            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
> ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
> hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |  109 |    8 |     0 |     3 |
>     hs20.rhel14-x86 |   76 |   40 |     0 |     3 |
>     x235sles9nonpae |   70 |   47 |     0 |     3 |
>          x335fc4pae |   83 |   34 |     0 |     3 |
>    x335sles9_pae4gb |   93 |   23 |     0 |     3 |

I'm not sure what's happening on your systems, but on my development 
system (i386 Ubuntu), I'm seeing only a few unexpected FAILs.  I've run 
xm-test about a dozen times on the recent tip with more or less 
consistent results (including with the new scheduler).  Perhaps there's 
something wrong in your setup?

Attached is a canonical example of one of the recent xm-test reports.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori