Re: [Xenomai-core] Porting xeno-{info|load|test} to a busybox system

[Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1470 bytes --]

Jim Cromie wrote:
> Niklaus Giger wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 26. Mai 2006 15:52 schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>>  
>>> Niklaus Giger wrote:    ...
>>> If anybody has a working target with a Xenomai + BusyBox combination and
>>> would be willing to test drive my changes, I would appreciate a feedback
>>> enormously.
>>>   
> 
> I hope this isnt waiting on my 'approval'.
> I think its a great idea, and has been on my (way too stagnant) list for
> a while.
> Your work has at least urged me to install busybox on my xeno-box. ;-)
> 
> My only concern is whether we've sufficiently distinguished the issues:
> 
> 1 - ash vs bash
> 
> Its not entirely clear to me which flavors of sh busybox has:
>     ash / dash / not-bash
> I gather u worked with ash, and it seems most valuable sh features
> work there just fine ( shell-functions, even 'job-control' of a fashion)
> 
> 2 - busybox 'executables' only
> 
> I coded in a lot of 'full linux' gimme's, like zgrep, script, etc.
> Niklaus has repaired many of these.  I think a more thorough cleanup is
> possible,
> esp if things like 'script' are jettisoned for a simpler shell-functions
> or helper scripts.
> This all implies a re-write, which is on my list...
> (esp the job-control testing and repair)

Just stumbled over this again while cleaning up my mailbox. What's the
status? Waiting for improvements, or waiting for /someone/ to type svn
ci (and improve the topics above later)?

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 250 bytes --]