From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <448DCF9F.807@domain.hid> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:33:35 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Porting xeno-{info|load|test} to a busybox system References: <200605252134.08614.niklaus.giger@domain.hid> <44770814.5040009@domain.hid> <200605261852.45980.niklaus.giger@domain.hid> <4485E647.7010205@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4485E647.7010205@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig278740BFB0405BDA5E7E07DE" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jim Cromie Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig278740BFB0405BDA5E7E07DE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jim Cromie wrote: > Niklaus Giger wrote: >> Am Freitag, 26. Mai 2006 15:52 schrieb Jan Kiszka: >> =20 >>> Niklaus Giger wrote: ... >>> If anybody has a working target with a Xenomai + BusyBox combination = and >>> would be willing to test drive my changes, I would appreciate a feedb= ack >>> enormously. >>> =20 >=20 > I hope this isnt waiting on my 'approval'. > I think its a great idea, and has been on my (way too stagnant) list fo= r > a while. > Your work has at least urged me to install busybox on my xeno-box. ;-) >=20 > My only concern is whether we've sufficiently distinguished the issues:= >=20 > 1 - ash vs bash >=20 > Its not entirely clear to me which flavors of sh busybox has: > ash / dash / not-bash > I gather u worked with ash, and it seems most valuable sh features > work there just fine ( shell-functions, even 'job-control' of a fashion= ) >=20 > 2 - busybox 'executables' only >=20 > I coded in a lot of 'full linux' gimme's, like zgrep, script, etc. > Niklaus has repaired many of these. I think a more thorough cleanup is= > possible, > esp if things like 'script' are jettisoned for a simpler shell-function= s > or helper scripts. > This all implies a re-write, which is on my list... > (esp the job-control testing and repair) Just stumbled over this again while cleaning up my mailbox. What's the status? Waiting for improvements, or waiting for /someone/ to type svn ci (and improve the topics above later)? Jan --------------enig278740BFB0405BDA5E7E07DE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEjc+fniDOoMHTA+kRAuXIAJ4xDkTqzvpaqcFj1CP5yLYzaFrKSwCbB1Oq 6TqHOTxlyoYLXxxZzh94maQ= =fDlc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig278740BFB0405BDA5E7E07DE--