From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <448E9E24.50207@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:14:44 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai integration to LTTng and LTTV References: <448E7C42.3030504@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <448E7C42.3030504@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig43C1881D8CE94589A8B6BDC6" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jean-Olivier Villemure Cc: ltt-dev@domain.hid, xenomai@xenomai.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig43C1881D8CE94589A8B6BDC6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jean-Olivier Villemure wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I'm currently working on my diploma thesis which will finish in Decembe= r > 2006. The first goal of my project is to integrate Xenomai events to > LTTng, a task quite simple since creating new events in LTTng is not > very difficult. Does this mean we will see a basic but usable LTTng over recent I-pipe/Xenomai soon? I'm only curious... 8) > The second goal is to create a new module in the viewer, > LTTV, to analyse these specifics events. >=20 > Our idea about the LTTV module is to create a new controlflow module > representing realtime task behavior by identifying the start, end, > suspend, resume, period, etc...The difference with the current > controlflow is that we will not be showing the states of the process, > but there will be a line for each task (multiple realtime tasks by > process) and identifiers for each important events. Eventualy it will b= e > good to detected problems relating to periodic tasks. If I have enough > time, it could also be a good idea to add some statistics. Could such an extension also be interesting for the native real-time Linux project (PREEMPT_RT)? I'm asking because, if yes, you may try to gain input from that community as well (=3D>LKML). This doesn't mean that= you have to implement such support, just keeping the approach open for an integration. Finding and meeting common requirements is always a good thing and can help even more people. >=20 > If you have any idea relating to Xenomai or LTTng/LTTV, I will > considerate them. >=20 > Thank you! > Jean-Olivier Villemure >=20 Jan --------------enig43C1881D8CE94589A8B6BDC6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEjp4kniDOoMHTA+kRAlVKAJ9cShdQvdTLaAXIBK34500oSk8pxgCggk36 /FRnaN1oMhfJUaovhipLGzw= =x0/9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig43C1881D8CE94589A8B6BDC6--