From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Netfilter Development Mailinglist <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Cc: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: [RFC] ctnetlink events drop benchmark
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:59:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <448ED2DD.30100@netfilter.org> (raw)
Hi,
Finally, I've got some results in my test enviroment about the ctnetlink
event drop issue. The machine used as firewall is a PIII 866 256 Mbytes
RAM, two NIC realtek 8139 100Mbits running debian unstable with linux
kernel 2.6.16.
I have run the same test with three different socket queue sizes:
107.520 (default)
215.040 (x2)
430.080 (x4)
I used netperf to create the connections with a shell script that loops
calling netperf -H ip -l 3 &.
To get the number of events dropped I've used the following:
$ conntrackd & (run as daemon)
$ conntrackd -s (request statistics)
Results are available in:
http://people.netfilter.org/pablo/ctnetlink/events.eps
Currently nlmsg_seq is not set in ctnetlink events, if we set it, we can
do some kind of sequence tracking on netlink. If an event gets lost, we
can request a resync with the conntrack via dump_conntrack.
Another choice could be relax conntrackd states transitions, currently
the valid transition sequence is: NEW -> UPDATE -> DESTROY, if an UPDATE
event is received but no NEW was seen previously, then the event is
ignored. Maybe this is too tight, but since I'm validating the whole
thing I prefer remaining "tight" at the moment.
Comments welcome.
--
The dawn of the fourth age of Linux firewalling is coming; a time of
great struggle and heroic deeds -- J.Kadlecsik got inspired by J.Morris
next reply other threads:[~2006-06-13 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-13 14:59 Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2006-06-14 7:44 ` [RFC] ctnetlink events drop benchmark Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-06-14 8:04 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-06-14 12:24 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2006-06-14 11:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2006-06-14 13:55 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-14 16:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2006-06-14 18:36 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=448ED2DD.30100@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.