From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.17: networking bug??
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:58:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <448EEE9D.10105@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <448ED9B3.8050506@rtr.ca>
..
> The site www.everymac.com is still not browseable until
> setting /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling===0.
>
> There's one other difference I see in the tcpdump traces.
> The first packets from each trace below show different
> values for "wscale". The old (working) kernels use "wscale 2",
> whereas 2.6.17 uses "wscale 6". In both cases, the value
> seen in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_adv_win_scale is 2.
Okay. More progress here. The calculation of the "wscale" values
is based on the "tcp_rmem" sysctl numbers.
The defaults for these *differ* between 2.6.16.18 and 2.6.17-rc*.
2.6.16: 4096 87380 174760
2.6.17: 4096 87380 2097152
If I change the tcp_rmem setting on 2.6.17 to match the old value,
then the website www.everymac.com becomes accessible again:
echo 4096 87380 174760 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_rmem
Looking at diffs between 2.6.16 and 2.6.17, I see a big rework
of the tcp_rmem code in linux/net/ipv4/tcp.c
Looks like something got broken there, or possibly the wscale
calculations have a bug that is only triggered by the new rmem values ??
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-13 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-13 14:08 2.6.17: networking bug?? Mark Lord
2006-06-13 14:26 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-13 15:00 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-13 15:28 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-13 16:58 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2006-06-13 17:22 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-13 17:39 ` John Heffner
2006-06-13 17:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-06-13 18:26 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-13 19:08 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-13 21:26 ` David Miller
2006-06-13 21:49 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-13 22:12 ` Rick Jones
2006-06-13 22:23 ` David Miller
2006-06-13 22:40 ` Rick Jones
2006-06-13 23:01 ` David Miller
2006-06-14 1:25 ` John Heffner
2006-06-13 23:22 ` Matt Mackall
2006-06-19 7:07 ` Helge Hafting
2006-06-14 5:18 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-14 8:09 ` Daniel Drake
2006-06-13 18:28 ` John Heffner
2006-06-13 20:45 ` Barry K. Nathan
2006-06-13 22:09 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-13 22:23 ` David Miller
2006-07-02 17:39 ` Jan Knutar
2006-06-19 6:57 ` Helge Hafting
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=448EEE9D.10105@rtr.ca \
--to=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.