All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>
To: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>,
	LSE-Tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Chandra S Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	John T Kohl <jtk@us.ibm.com>, Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] Task watchers:  Register per-task delay accounting task watcher
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:31:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <448F8302.3030706@watson.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1150242889.21787.147.camel@stark>




Matt Helsley wrote:

>Adapts delayacct to use Task Watchers. Does not adapt taskstats to use Task
>Watchers.
>
>Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
>Cc: Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>
>Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
>Cc: Chandra S. Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
>--
>
> include/linux/delayacct.h |    2 +-
> kernel/delayacct.c        |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/exit.c             |    2 --
> kernel/fork.c             |    2 --
> 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>
>  
>
<snip>

>Index: linux-2.6.17-rc5-mm2/include/linux/delayacct.h
>===================================================================
>--- linux-2.6.17-rc5-mm2.orig/include/linux/delayacct.h
>+++ linux-2.6.17-rc5-mm2/include/linux/delayacct.h
>@@ -59,11 +59,11 @@ static inline void delayacct_tsk_init(st
> 		__delayacct_tsk_init(tsk);
> }
> 
> static inline void delayacct_tsk_exit(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
>-	if (tsk->delays)
>+	if (unlikely(tsk->delays))
> 		__delayacct_tsk_exit(tsk);
> }
>  
>

This snippet does not belong to this patchset...since the same check 
(for tsk->delays) is
being used elsewhere in the delay accounting code, changes to use of 
likely/unlikely should
be done elsewhere too, if deemed necesssary.

Otherwise patch looks good though I've not tested whether delay 
accounting works unaffected
(don't see any reason why it shouldn't).


--Shailabh



  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-14  3:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20060613235122.130021000@localhost.localdomain>
2006-06-13 23:53 ` [PATCH 01/11] Task watchers: Task Watchers Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  0:19   ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14  0:55     ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 02/11] Task watchers: Register process events task watcher Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  0:39   ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14  0:52     ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 03/11] Task watchers: Refactor process events Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  0:43   ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14  1:11     ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  8:09       ` Chase Venters
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 04/11] Task watchers: Make process events configurable as a module Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  0:54   ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14  1:18     ` [Lse-tech] " Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 05/11] Task watchers: Allow task watchers to block Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 06/11] Task watchers: Register audit task watcher Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54   ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-14 14:46   ` Alexander Viro
2006-06-14 14:46     ` Alexander Viro
2006-06-14 23:28     ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-14 23:28       ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 07/11] Task watchers: Register per-task delay accounting " Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  3:31   ` Shailabh Nagar [this message]
2006-06-14 22:52     ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 08/11] Task watchers: Register profile as a " Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  0:59   ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14  1:16     ` [Lse-tech] " Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:55 ` [PATCH 09/11] Task watchers: Add support for per-task watchers Matt Helsley
2006-06-20  5:28   ` Peter Williams
2006-06-20 22:56     ` [Lse-tech] " Matt Helsley
2006-06-20 23:15       ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-20 23:23         ` Peter Williams
2006-06-21  1:20         ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-21  1:46           ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-21  1:55             ` Peter Williams
2006-06-21 13:01               ` Peter Williams
2006-06-21 13:23                 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-21  2:28             ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-20 23:21       ` Peter Williams
2006-06-13 23:55 ` [PATCH 10/11] Task watchers: Register semundo task watcher Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:55 ` [PATCH 11/11] Task watchers: Register per-task semundo watcher Matt Helsley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=448F8302.3030706@watson.ibm.com \
    --to=nagar@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=jes@sgi.com \
    --cc=jtk@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.