From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4490381F.6030309@domain.hid>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 18:23:59 +0200
From: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] /proc/xenomai broken...
References: <17552.12922.452992.652848@domain.hid>	<44903432.3070905@domain.hid>
	<17552.13951.428423.915304@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <17552.13951.428423.915304@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org

Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>  > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>  > > When using xenomai trunk, it appears that /proc/xenomai is no longer a
>  > > directory but a file returning "0".
>  > > 
>  > 
>  > Check your recent changes for giving the nucleus a regular syscall 
>  > table. I would not be surprised of some side-effect there. i.e. 
>  > something going on with the xnptree_t descriptor?
> 
> That is exactly the source of the problem, since iface_proc_root in
> nucleus/module.c has not yet been set, the proc entry for the nucleus
> interface get created directly under /proc instead of
> /proc/xenomai/interfaces.
> 
> Do we need a /proc entry for this interface ?
> 

Not really. This would only give the exact number of processes bound to 
the nucleus, whilst major interface counters already display the number 
of bound threads.

-- 

Philippe.