From: Barry Scott <barry.scott@onelan.co.uk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] PCI extended conf space when MMCONFIG disabled because of e820
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:32:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44916F99.7030006@onelan.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44915E3C.5000608@linux.intel.com>
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>> In-Reply-To: <p73ac8fqjix.fsf@verdi.suse.de>
>>
>> On 15 Jun 2006 03:45:10 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>
>>> Anyways I would say that if the BIOS can't get MCFG right then it's
>>> likely not been validated on that board and shouldn't be used.
>>
>> According to Petr Vandrovec:
>>
>> ... "What is important (and checked) is address of MMCONFIG reported
>> by MCFG
>> table... Unfortunately code does not bother with printing that
>> address :-(
>>
>> "Another problem is that code has hardcoded that MMCONFIG area is
>> 256MB large. Unfortunately for the code PCI specification allows any
>> power of two between 2MB and 256MB if vendor knows that such amount
>> of busses (from 2 to 128) will be sufficient for system. With
>> notebook it is quite possible that not full 8 bits are implemented
>> for MMCONFIG bus number."
>>
>>
>> So here is a patch. Unfortunately my system still fails the test
>> because
>> it doesn't reserve any part of the MMCONFIG area, but this may fix
>> others.
>>
>> Booted on x86_64, only compiled on i386. x86_64 still remaps the max
>> area
>> (256MB) even though only 2MB is checked... but 2.6.16 had no check at
>> all
>> so it is still better.
>>
>>
>> PCI: reduce size of x86 MMCONFIG reserved area check
>>
>> 1. Print the address of the MMCONFIG area when the test for that area
>> being reserved fails.
>>
>> 2. Only check if the first 2MB is reserved, as that is the minimum.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
>
> Acked-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
I have a system that fails to boot reporting MCFG problems.
I've applied your patch and it allowed the HP dc7600U to boot past
the MCFG problem. (I still have LVM problems - but that nothing
to do with this patch).
My shuttle P4 system also boots with your patch applied.
Barry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-15 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-15 8:41 [RFC] PCI extended conf space when MMCONFIG disabled because of e820 Chuck Ebbert
2006-06-15 13:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-15 14:32 ` Barry Scott [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-14 21:07 Brice Goglin
2006-06-14 21:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-15 1:45 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-15 1:57 ` Brice Goglin
2006-06-15 6:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-21 22:19 ` Rajesh Shah
2006-06-21 22:32 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-22 0:15 ` Rajesh Shah
2006-06-22 9:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-23 7:41 ` Rajesh Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44916F99.7030006@onelan.co.uk \
--to=barry.scott@onelan.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.