From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FrFYY-0001ZJ-Nl
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:44:18 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FrFYW-0001Yf-5p
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:44:17 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FrFYW-0001Yc-1J
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:44:16 -0400
Received: from [65.254.53.84] (helo=smtp.astolat-it.co.uk)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FrFi9-0004zj-OZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:54:13 -0400
Received: from [192.168.6.2] (timdw.plus.com [84.92.164.25])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.astolat-it.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0203C318E001
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 14:44:14 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <4492C3B7.40502@astolat.it>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:44:07 +0100
From: Tim Walker <tim@astolat.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: VMware Player
References: <a6ee49d30606160728s3e0fa3c6g21eb697c295f9ae9@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a6ee49d30606160728s3e0fa3c6g21eb697c295f9ae9@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Christian Bourque wrote:
>> Face it, putting a GUI on something like QEMU is going to require at
>> least a one per desktop/platform effort.  And that can best be kept with
>> the GNOME/KDE/etc software repositories because they require constant
>> updating on the schedule of the rest of the desktop environment to stay
>> current.
>
> In the development version of my Java frontend for QEMU (JQEMU) I've
> already integrated the Java VNC client from TightVNC and it works like
> a charm without any speed overhead! And it feels just like VMWare...
>
> Since Java is already available for a large variety of platforms this
> wouldn't require a big porting effort...
>
> Christian
This gets my vote. Have you tried a compile to native with gcj for those 
who don't have/want to have the Java VM installed?