From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: romain@dolbeau.org (Romain Dolbeau) Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 15:52:09 +0000 Subject: [lm-sensors] Second request to support the 'Analog Devices Message-Id: <44942529.9040100@dolbeau.org> List-Id: References: <449408C1.1000307@dolbeau.org> In-Reply-To: <449408C1.1000307@dolbeau.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > *If* the chip looks very much like an lm85 or an ATDT7463, *and* you get us > a full datasheet, we can try to do a spec-sheet-based change to lm85 and > carefully review it before you try. At least it shouldn't oops the kernel > :-) and chances are it will actually work fine. I don't know how much like previous chip it looks, I was merely shamelessly quoting Jean Delvare (see ). As for the datasheet, the job of looking has already been done for me by the lm-sensors folk ;-) the 'new drivers' page mentions: which includes a link to a what is described as a data sheet (I have zero idea whether it includes the relevant datas, but it does include 72 pages of technical stuff I understand nothing about) : Whenever there's some code to try, I can schedule some downtime to test (I just can't do it too often). Thanks for your help, -- Romain Dolbeau