From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
	by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F513E01409
	for <webhob@yoctoproject.org>; Fri, 31 May 2013 07:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
	by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 May 2013 07:02:42 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,779,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="346190352"
Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.185])
	by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 May 2013 07:02:41 -0700
From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: webhob@yoctoproject.org
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 15:02:40 +0100
Message-ID: <4494389.ENWZ8JdZbF@helios>
Organization: Intel Corporation
User-Agent: KMail/4.10.2 (Linux/3.8.0-22-generic; KDE/4.10.2; i686; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKoZmi=XXLa-7OA-fB1=A9SQ7U_NTUcHHWyxPFyraa3MuQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1369923685.14887.300.camel@ted>
	<CDCE6765.2B21D%belen.barros.pena@intel.com>
	<CAP9ODKoZmi=XXLa-7OA-fB1=A9SQ7U_NTUcHHWyxPFyraa3MuQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "Dragomir, CalinX L" <calinx.l.dragomir@intel.com>, "Zhang,
	Jessica" <jessica.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Webhob] task types and outcomes
X-BeenThere: webhob@yoctoproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: <webhob.yoctoproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/options/webhob>,
	<mailto:webhob-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/webhob>
List-Post: <mailto:webhob@yoctoproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webhob-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/webhob>,
	<mailto:webhob-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 14:02:43 -0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On Friday 31 May 2013 10:53:43 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Barros Pena, Belen <
> 
> belen.barros.pena@intel.com> wrote:
> > On 30/05/2013 15:21, "Richard Purdie" <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
> > 
> > wrote:
> > >> So for the 'all tasks' table, we could have a 'task type' column
> > >> classifying tasks as 'executed' and 'not executed'.
> > >
> > >I'd prefer "Prebuilt" than "not executed" but yes.
> > 
> > Prebuilt sounds good to me, but it causes a bit of a naming issue. We have
> > identified 3 possible 'Outcomes' for prebuilt tasks: sstate, skipped and
> > previously built (tasks for which an stamp file exists). 'Prebuilt' and
> > 'Previously built' are too similar, which is bound to cause confusion.
> > 
> > Does any of you have any ideas for a better name for the 'Previously
> > built' outcome?
> 
> What about 'Cached'?

That clashes with the sstate "cache". Not that I have any better suggestion...

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre