All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nigel J. Terry" <nigel@nigelterry.net>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid5 reshape
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 18:01:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44947BCA.9040305@nigelterry.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17556.31295.280083.533342@cse.unsw.edu.au>


Neil Brown wrote:
> On Saturday June 17, nigel@nigelterry.net wrote:
>   
>> Any ideas what I should do next? Thanks
>>
>>     
>
> Looks like you've probably hit a bug.  I'll need a bit more info
> though.
>
> First:
>
>   
>> [root@homepc ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
>> Personalities : [raid5] [raid4]
>> md0 : active raid5 sdb1[1] sda1[0] hdc1[4](S) hdb1[2]
>>       490223104 blocks super 0.91 level 5, 128k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/3] 
>> [UUU_]
>>       [=>...................]  reshape =  6.9% (17073280/245111552) 
>> finish=86.3min speed=44003K/sec
>>
>> unused devices: <none>
>>     
>
> This really makes it look like the reshape is progressing.  How
> long after the reboot was this taken?  How long after hdc1 has hot
> added (roughly)?  What does it show now?
>
> What happens if you remove hdc1 again?  Does the reshape keep going?
>
> What I would expect to happen in this case is that the array reshapes
> into a degraded array, then the missing disk is recovered onto hdc1.
>
> NeilBrown
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>   
I don't know how long the system was reshaping before the power went 
off, and then I had to restart when the power came back. It claimed it 
was going to take 430 minutes, so 6% would be about 25 minutes, which 
could make good sense, certainly it looked like it was working fine when 
I went out.

Now nothing is happening, it shows:

[root@homepc ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active raid5 sdb1[1] sda1[0] hdc1[4](S) hdb1[2]
      490223104 blocks super 0.91 level 5, 128k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/3] 
[UUU_]
      [=>...................]  reshape =  6.9% (17073280/245111552) 
finish=2281.2min speed=1665K/sec

unused devices: <none>
[root@homepc ~]#

so the only thing changing is the time till finish.

I'll try removing and adding /dev/hdc1 again. Will it make any 
difference if the device is mounted or not?

Nigel

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-17 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-16  6:34 Raid5 reshape Tim
2006-06-16  6:41 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-16 16:00   ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-16 16:14     ` Tim T
2006-06-16 22:28       ` Neil Brown
2006-06-16 22:39         ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-16 22:44           ` Neil Brown
2006-06-17 19:21             ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-17 21:55               ` Neil Brown
2006-06-17 22:01                 ` Nigel J. Terry [this message]
2006-06-17 22:05                   ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-17 22:17                     ` Neil Brown
2006-06-17 22:19                       ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-18 12:57                         ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-19  2:03                           ` Neil Brown
2006-06-19 21:42                             ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-19 22:46                               ` Neil Brown
2006-06-19 22:53                                 ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-19 23:29                                   ` Mike Hardy
2006-06-19 23:33                                     ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-19 23:33                                   ` Neil Brown
2006-06-19 23:35                                     ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-20 10:35                                       ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-21  6:02                                         ` Neil Brown
2006-06-24 22:58                                           ` Raid5 reshape (Solved) Nigel J. Terry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44947BCA.9040305@nigelterry.net \
    --to=nigel@nigelterry.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.