From: Kevin Read <kread@uni-koblenz.de>
To: BlueZ users <bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] Multiple connections with kernel 2.4 make HCI die
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 23:19:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4495C348.70501@uni-koblenz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1150657327.8816.20.camel@localhost>
Marcel Holtmann wrote:
Hi Marcel,
thanks for the quick answer.
>> I know that kernel 2.4 is no longer supported, but I hope that somebody
>> can give me a clue here...
>>
>> I'm attempting to create a multi-threaded, multi-dongle OBEX client
>> appliance. When I run it on a kernel 2.6 based machine (either a x86 or
>> on a NSLU2, which is a big-endian ARM box), everything runs very smooth.
>>
>> The same code compiled for a little endian MIPS machine running kernel
>> 2.4.30 has problems. I cannot change the kernel version, because the
>> on-board Broadcom wireless chipset of the router doesn't really work yet
>> under kernel 2.6 (damn closed source drivers) :(
>
> I am not buying this argument, because the bcm43xx open source driver
> exists. Otherwise simply swap the mini-PCI card for an Intel one.
This is slightly OT but I hope it might be of interest to some:
I have already tried to compile the bcm43xx driver in OpenWRT kamikaze.
Master mode will only work with the devicescape-branch of bcm43xx. Some
OpenWRT co-users patched the Kamikaze kernel up to the latest code from
the wireless-dev git repository. Unfortunately there was no joy there.
Master mode does not yet run correctly, although the outlook is pretty
good, as patches integrating bcm43xx and Hostap where sent to the
bcm43xx devs and will hopefully get integrated soon.
Unfortunately for me, I need WDS and this has not yet been coded. And
Kamikaze kernel 2.6 USB is broken at the moment, so I couldn't test
bluetooth operation on the 2.6 :(
I'll look into swapping the mini-PCI card, thanks for the pointer. That
might become a great alternative once the USB problems get sorted out.
<snip>
>>
>> I have applied the changes in the 2.4.32 patch by Marcel, but I think
>> they only refer to module unloading. Bluez installed is version 2.32. I
>> already stressed the USB bus with wireless and a hard disk, to rule out
>> that the usb driver has some funkiness, but everything went smooth.
>
> You can try to make sure that the hci_usb driver doesn't use any ISOC
> transfers for SCO. The 2.4 USB subsystem was kinda picky about it. Other
> than that you don't really have a choice except re-writing the hci_usb
> driver.
Ok, I'll rebuild a kernel with SCO support right away. Will that
suffice, or should I comment out the ISOC stuff in hci_usb.c?
I don't think I'll manage a re-write of hci_usb :/ Waiting for solid 2.6
usb and bcm43xx support will definitely be faster than that ;)
Regards and thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Bluez-users mailing list
Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-18 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-17 13:07 [Bluez-users] Multiple connections with kernel 2.4 make HCI die Kevin Read
2006-06-18 19:02 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-06-18 21:19 ` Kevin Read [this message]
2006-06-19 4:43 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-06-19 16:13 ` Brand, Chris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4495C348.70501@uni-koblenz.de \
--to=kread@uni-koblenz.de \
--cc=bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.