From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fsa8N-0006ry-Q5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 02:54:47 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fsa8N-0006rm-21 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 02:54:47 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fsa8M-0006rh-U8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 02:54:46 -0400 Received: from [82.227.67.108] (helo=valhalla.twilight-hall.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FsaIp-0002pA-S7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 03:05:36 -0400 Message-ID: <44979BB4.5060703@twilight-hall.net> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:54:44 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rapha=EBl_Rigo?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mips-user socket-related syscall support References: <449667B1.5070300@twilight-hall.net> <44971F2A.9050004@bellard.org> In-Reply-To: <44971F2A.9050004@bellard.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Fabrice Bellard Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Fabrice Bellard wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Is it really needed to duplicate socket.h ? What are the differences fo= r > mips ? >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Fabrice. >=20 Hi, almost all socket related constants are different on MIPS. I thought it w= ould be cleaner to define all constants for each target, so that if we add suppo= rt for another platform with different constants, it will be easy. Rapha=EBl