All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
To: Niccolo Rigacci <niccolo@rigacci.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New FAQ entry? (was IBM xSeries stop responding during RAID1 reconstruction)
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:10:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44997D8E.2090406@dgreaves.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060621160907.GA20630@rigacci.org>

OK :)

David

Niccolo Rigacci wrote:
> Thanks to the several guys in this list, I have solved my problem 
> and elaborated this, can be a new FAQ entry?
>
>
>
> Q: Sometimes when a RAID volume is resyncing, the system seems to 
> locks-up: every disk activity is blocked until resync is done.
>
> A: This is not strictly related to Linux RAID, this is a problem 
> related to the Linux kernel and the disk subsytem: in no 
> circumstances a process should get all the disk resources 
> preventing others to access them.
>
> You can control the max speed at which RAID reconstruction is 
> done by setting it, say at 5 Mb/s:
>
>   echo 5000 > /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max
>
> This is just a workaround, you have to determine the max speed 
> that does not lock your system by trial and error and you cannot 
> predict what will be the disk load in the future when the RAID 
> will be resyncing for some reason.
>
> Starting from version 2.6, Linux kernel has several choices about 
> the I/O scheduler to be used. The default is the anticipatory 
> scheduler, which seems to be sub-optimal on resync high load. If 
> your kernel has the CFQ scheduler compiled in, use it during 
> resync.
>
> >From the command line you can see which schedulers are supported 
> and change it on the fly (remember to do it for each RAID disk):
>
>   # cat /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler
>   noop [anticipatory] deadline cfq
>   # echo cfq > /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler
>
> Otherwise you can recompile your kernel and set CFQ as the 
> default I/O scheduler (CONFIG_DEFAULT_CFQ=y in Block layer, IO 
> Schedulers, Default I/O scheduler).
>
>
>   


-- 


  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-21 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-21 16:09 New FAQ entry? (was IBM xSeries stop responding during RAID1 reconstruction) Niccolo Rigacci
2006-06-21 17:10 ` David Greaves [this message]
2006-06-21 18:51 ` Michael Tokarev
2006-06-22  2:20   ` Mark Hahn
2006-06-22  4:35     ` Gil
2006-06-22  7:11       ` Niccolo Rigacci
2006-06-23  3:14         ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44997D8E.2090406@dgreaves.com \
    --to=david@dgreaves.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niccolo@rigacci.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.