Re: [Ubuntu PATCH] 3w-9xyz: add proc_name

[Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>]

adam radford wrote:
> Randy,
> 
> Is there any reason why any of these proc_name patches need to
> go in after James Smart's explanation:

Nope.  Thanks for your comments.

~Randy

> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=115040210406375&w=2
> 
> in particular, the part about:
> 
> "- scsi_proc_hostdir_add() validates that sht->proc_info is non-null before
>   attempting to use sht->proc_name."
> 
> proc_info is null for the 3w-9xxx driver.
> 
> -Adam
> 
> On 6/20/06, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Add .proc_name member to scsi_host_template for 3w-9xxx.
>>
>> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/bcollins/ubuntu-dapper.git;a=commitdiff;h=12fdf64086335ed596848cf17602e7a71e15ae9b
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/3w-9xxx.c |    1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> --- linux-2617-pv.orig/drivers/scsi/3w-9xxx.c
>> +++ linux-2617-pv/drivers/scsi/3w-9xxx.c
>> @@ -2011,6 +2011,7 @@ static void twa_unmap_scsi_data(TW_Devic
>>  /* scsi_host_template initializer */
>>  static struct scsi_host_template driver_template = {
>>         .module                 = THIS_MODULE,
>> +       .proc_name              = "3w-9xxx",
>>         .name                   = "3ware 9000 Storage Controller",
>>         .queuecommand           = twa_scsi_queue,
>>         .eh_host_reset_handler  = twa_scsi_eh_reset,
>>
>>
>>
>> -