From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mbligh@mbligh.org,
Mattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: fs/binfmt_aout.o, Error: suffix or operands invalid for `cmp' [was Re: 2.6.1
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:27:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <449C168F.30708@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0606230456220.1145@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>>
>> It's not (it's #APP, i.e. inline assembly); rather, it's an illegal
>> constraint.
>
> It's GCC optimizing a little too much.
>
No, it's not... it's the author of the inline assembly who told gcc a
lie at what it was allowed to optimize. The constraint is "g"
(equivalent to "rmi"), but "rm" is the correct constraint.
There is already a patch in Andrew's repo for this.
>
> #define __range_ok(addr,size) ({ \
> unsigned long flag,sum; \
> __chk_user_ptr(addr); \
> asm("addl %3,%1 ; sbbl %0,%0; cmpl %1,%4; sbbl $0,%0" \
> :"=&r" (flag), "=r" (sum) \
> :"1" (addr),"g" ((int)(size)),"g" (current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg)); \
> flag; })
>
> What happened was that gcc optimized the
> (current_thread_info()->addre_limit.seg to be a constant. Thus cmpl
> failed.
>
... perfectly legally so, given the "g" constraint.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-23 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-22 6:34 fs/binfmt_aout.o, Error: suffix or operands invalid for `cmp' [was Re: 2.6.1 Chuck Ebbert
2006-06-22 15:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-06-23 9:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-23 16:27 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2006-06-24 11:53 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=449C168F.30708@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=malattia@linux.it \
--cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.