From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: ondemand vs suspend. Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:45:22 -0700 Message-ID: <449C6F02.7090103@goop.org> References: <44972ACB.2040609@goop.org> <20060621115413.A16324@unix-os.sc.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060621115413.A16324@unix-os.sc.intel.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Venkatesh Pallipadi Cc: Dave Jones , pjones@redhat.com, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote: > Does it only happen on CPU 1 or both the CPUs? What does /sys/.../cpufreq > look like once you get to this stuck at lowest freq state? Does > scaling_available_frequencies still show all the freqs. > Did you have a chance to look at this, or should I do more investigation? J