From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Ted <txtoth@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/7] NetLabel: CIPSOv4 engine
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:45:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <449C7D2E.8000101@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606231906380.6209@d.namei>
James Morris wrote:
>
> Support for interoperability with legacy CIPSO systems is something that I
> think would be nice to have, if it can be done in a way which doesn't
> impact deeply on core kernel code, and plays nicely with native Linux
> infrastructure.
>
I'm not sure if you have had a chance to look at the new patch set yet
but I know you have seen earlier versions and are at least familiar with
the approach I am taking ... in your opinion is the NetLabel patch
acceptable in its approach?
--
paul moore
linux security @ hp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-23 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-21 19:42 [RFC 0/7] Updated NetLabel patch paul.moore
2006-06-21 19:42 ` paul.moore
2006-06-21 19:42 ` [RFC 1/7] NetLabel: documentation paul.moore
2006-06-21 19:42 ` paul.moore
2006-06-21 19:42 ` [RFC 2/7] NetLabel: core network changes paul.moore
2006-06-21 19:42 ` paul.moore
2006-06-22 9:00 ` David Miller
2006-06-22 15:05 ` Steve Grubb
2006-06-22 15:05 ` Steve Grubb
2006-06-22 18:58 ` James Morris
2006-06-22 21:32 ` David Miller
2006-06-22 9:07 ` David Miller
2006-06-22 13:20 ` Paul Moore
2006-06-22 13:20 ` Paul Moore
2006-06-21 19:42 ` [RFC 3/7] NetLabel: CIPSOv4 engine paul.moore
2006-06-21 19:42 ` paul.moore
2006-06-22 9:12 ` David Miller
2006-06-22 13:43 ` Paul Moore
2006-06-22 13:43 ` Paul Moore
2006-06-22 15:57 ` Ryan Pratt
2006-06-23 18:48 ` Ted
2006-06-23 20:15 ` David Miller
2006-06-23 20:34 ` Ted
2006-06-23 23:24 ` James Morris
2006-06-23 23:45 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2006-06-26 15:32 ` James Morris
2006-06-26 23:14 ` [redhat-lspp] " Joe Nall
2006-06-26 23:14 ` Joe Nall
2006-06-27 0:33 ` James Morris
2006-06-27 0:33 ` James Morris
2006-06-27 2:45 ` Paul Moore
2006-06-27 2:45 ` Paul Moore
2006-06-27 19:41 ` Klaus Weidner
2006-06-27 19:41 ` Klaus Weidner
2006-06-21 19:42 ` [RFC 4/7] NetLabel: core NetLabel subsystem paul.moore
2006-06-21 19:42 ` paul.moore
2006-06-21 21:15 ` Steve Grubb
2006-06-21 21:24 ` [redhat-lspp] " Paul Moore
2006-06-21 21:26 ` Steve Grubb
2006-06-21 19:42 ` [RFC 5/7] NetLabel: SELinux support paul.moore
2006-06-21 19:42 ` paul.moore
2006-06-21 19:42 ` [RFC 6/7] NetLabel: CIPSOv4 integration paul.moore
2006-06-21 19:42 ` paul.moore
2006-06-21 19:42 ` [RFC 7/7] NetLabel: unlabeled packet handling paul.moore
2006-06-21 19:42 ` paul.moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=449C7D2E.8000101@hp.com \
--to=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=txtoth@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.