From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH] balloon: don't talk about low/high memory when there is no such distinction Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 10:14:19 +0200 Message-ID: <449FB37B.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> References: <449BFA1E.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> <20060624145124.GA11269@rhun.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060624145124.GA11269@rhun.ibm.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Muli Ben-Yehuda Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> Muli Ben-Yehuda 24.06.06 16:51 >>> >On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 02:26:38PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> .. in order to not confuse people. > >This will confuse any tool that parses the output of the file >though. The ifdefs are also pretty ugly... is the current output so >confusing? I did get confused - I imagined 'high' and 'low' to be something entirely different until I looked at the code in greater detail. I generally consider tools depending on spelling or other similar things broken. But of course, this is a personal opinion perhaps based on my non-Unix/Linux origin. Jan