From: Andy Furniss <lists@andyfurniss.entadsl.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] please advise me in HTB and HFSC
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:42:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <449FD63D.3030306@andyfurniss.entadsl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAY123-F266D7E5E4E0651C2951702DD850@phx.gbl>
*~ r a K u ~ * wrote:
> now i'm read a lot of knowledge paper about traffic control in linux because now
> i'm try to develop and research about traffic shaper so can everybody tell me
> about my topic ... Is it can do for real????
>
> my topic is "
> now, many organization use traffic shaper for control traffic and bandwidth
> because don't want something example
> some mac address, ip address, traffic in that port or that application use a lot
> of bandwidth more than it appropriate should use example if people in
> organization try to use p2p application ,it may make a lot of problem for all
> bandwidth in organization
>
> now most famous algorithm to manage queue in mastershaper is "HTB" but i have
> just read some paper their tell about
> "HFSC" algorithm ,it's very good to manage real-time application traffic so i
> think may be performance when HTB manage real-time application are not work if i
> comparable with performance by HFSC"
>
> so my project is ... i want to develop new traffic shaper that use 2 algorithm
> simultaneously (HTB for manage general traffic and HFSC for manage only real
> time application) by when the package come in my shaper outbound i will have one
> filter for
> filtering that package about what kind of that package??(general or real time
> application package) and then after filtering it will continue send that package
> to appropriate queue to mananage shaper later"
>
> sorry for my bad english so much
> may be you don't understand my project topic so looking in my picture.
>
>
> ________ (general package)
> outbound | |------------------------------ HTB
> ------eth0----------- filter |
> |_______ |------------------------------- HFSC
> (real time application package)
>
> now my problem is... i read a lot paper they tell if i want to use traffic
> shaper in outbound side. In linux i must use tc command for setting it, but it's
> telling me about setting algoritm will start to set in root qdisc and root qdisc
> is outboud side
> so i fear about i can't setting 2 algorithm simultaneously
>
> so please advise me , if you think i'm misunderstand and Is it can do for
> real??? what should i do???
You only have one link so should only normally use one shaper.
Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-26 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-22 6:54 [LARTC] please advise me in HTB and HFSC *~ r a K u ~ *
2006-06-26 12:42 ` Andy Furniss [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=449FD63D.3030306@andyfurniss.entadsl.com \
--to=lists@andyfurniss.entadsl.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.