From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: ondemand vs suspend. Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:23:21 -0700 Message-ID: <44A03429.40304@goop.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" Cc: Dave Jones , pjones@redhat.com, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > I am not able to reprocude this on my Core Duo system. At this point I > will need some more information on what exactly happens at this point of > failure to start looking at the code.. Like questions above. Does > scaling_available_frequencies still show all freqs. What is *max *min > values in /sys/.../cpufreq/ .. > Yes, all the expected frequencies are there. I sent you mail with all the contents of /sys/.../cpu?/cpufreq/... the other day; should I resend it? Thanks, J