From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: ondemand vs suspend. Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:20:36 -0700 Message-ID: <44A300B4.8050202@goop.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" Cc: Dave Jones , pjones@redhat.com, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > Strange. I guess only scaling_max_freq is changing and not > cpuinfo_max_freq. Right? > Can you try stopping the applet and see whether anything changes? > Is the system idle while these changes happen or the load is varying > causing some frequency changes by conservative on CPU 0? > > I am not able to reproduce this with periodic reading of > scaling_cur_freq. May be soemthing else is happening from userlevel that > is causing this.. > Sorry, I haven't got around to looking at this closely again. However, the behaviour with 2.6.17-mm3 has changed a bit. Now on resume, the cpufreq applets exit for some reason, and both CPUs end up with a max speed of 1GHz. > Can you enable cpufreq.debug and capture the log. > Will do. J