From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] improved statistics for bcm43xx-softmac
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:08:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44A3524C.40704@lwfinger.net> (raw)
This patch improves the statistics returned from bcm43xx_get_wireless_stats. The signal level comes
from smoothing the rssi value returned by the firmware. The quality value is a hack derived from the
smoothed rssi value and an assumed rssi_max of -25. If anyone has a better value, please let me
know. The noise value is still the one calculated from the clean-room formula. On my system, this is
roughly -65 dBm, which seems too high. I would appreciate getting any ideas on what other
interface/driver combinations get for the noise value.
Signed-Off-By: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
==========================================================
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c
index af97755..c80fdcd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c
@@ -1581,17 +1581,8 @@ static void handle_irq_noise(struct bcm4
else
average -= 48;
-/* FIXME: This is wrong, but people want fancy stats. well... */
-bcm->stats.noise = average;
- if (average > -65)
- bcm->stats.link_quality = 0;
- else if (average > -75)
- bcm->stats.link_quality = 1;
- else if (average > -85)
- bcm->stats.link_quality = 2;
- else
- bcm->stats.link_quality = 3;
-// dprintk(KERN_INFO PFX "Link Quality: %u (avg was %d)\n", bcm->stats.link_quality, average);
+/* FIXME: This matches the formula from the clean-room, but yields a value that is probably too
large. */
+ bcm->stats.noise = average;
drop_calculation:
bcm->noisecalc.calculation_running = 0;
return;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_wx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_wx.c
index 5c36e29..8224da1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_wx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_wx.c
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ #include "bcm43xx_phy.h"
#define BCM43xx_WX_VERSION 18
#define MAX_WX_STRING 80
+/* FIXME: the next line is a guess as to what the maximum value of rssi might be */
+#define RSSI_MAX -25
static int bcm43xx_wx_get_name(struct net_device *net_dev,
@@ -227,15 +229,15 @@ static int bcm43xx_wx_get_rangeparams(st
range->max_qual.qual = 100;
/* TODO: Real max RSSI */
- range->max_qual.level = 3;
- range->max_qual.noise = 100;
- range->max_qual.updated = 7;
-
- range->avg_qual.qual = 70;
- range->avg_qual.level = 2;
- range->avg_qual.noise = 40;
- range->avg_qual.updated = 7;
-
+ range->max_qual.level = -100;
+ range->max_qual.noise = -100;
+ range->max_qual.updated = IW_QUAL_ALL_UPDATED;
+
+ range->avg_qual.qual = 50;
+ range->avg_qual.level = -40;
+ range->avg_qual.noise = -65;
+ range->avg_qual.updated = IW_QUAL_ALL_UPDATED;
+
range->min_rts = BCM43xx_MIN_RTS_THRESHOLD;
range->max_rts = BCM43xx_MAX_RTS_THRESHOLD;
range->min_frag = MIN_FRAG_THRESHOLD;
@@ -827,6 +829,8 @@ static struct iw_statistics *bcm43xx_get
struct bcm43xx_private *bcm = bcm43xx_priv(net_dev);
struct ieee80211softmac_device *mac = ieee80211_priv(net_dev);
struct iw_statistics *wstats;
+ struct ieee80211_network *network = NULL;
+ static int tmp_level = 0;
wstats = &bcm->stats.wstats;
if (!mac->associated) {
@@ -849,11 +853,19 @@ static struct iw_statistics *bcm43xx_get
return wstats;
}
/* fill in the real statistics when iface associated */
- wstats->qual.qual = 100; // TODO: get the real signal quality
- wstats->qual.level = 3 - bcm->stats.link_quality;
+ list_for_each_entry(network, &mac->ieee->network_list, list) {
+ if (!memcmp(mac->associnfo.bssid, network->bssid, ETH_ALEN)) {
+ if (!tmp_level) /* get initial value */
+ tmp_level = network->stats.rssi;
+ else /* smooth results */
+ tmp_level = (7 * tmp_level + network->stats.rssi)/8;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ wstats->qual.level = tmp_level;
+ wstats->qual.qual = 100 + tmp_level - RSSI_MAX; // TODO: get the real signal quality
wstats->qual.noise = bcm->stats.noise;
- wstats->qual.updated = IW_QUAL_QUAL_UPDATED | IW_QUAL_LEVEL_UPDATED |
- IW_QUAL_NOISE_UPDATED;
+ wstats->qual.updated = IW_QUAL_ALL_UPDATED;
wstats->discard.code = bcm->ieee->ieee_stats.rx_discards_undecryptable;
wstats->discard.retries = bcm->ieee->ieee_stats.tx_retry_limit_exceeded;
wstats->discard.nwid = bcm->ieee->ieee_stats.tx_discards_wrong_sa;
==================
next reply other threads:[~2006-06-29 4:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-29 4:08 Larry Finger [this message]
2006-06-29 15:12 ` [PATCH] improved statistics for bcm43xx-softmac Michael Buesch
2006-06-29 15:31 ` Larry Finger
2006-06-29 20:56 ` Dan Williams
2006-06-30 3:07 ` Larry Finger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44A3524C.40704@lwfinger.net \
--to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.