All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-lkml@reub.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@zen.co.uk>
Subject: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 dislikes raid-1, just like mm4
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:43:56 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44A74F0C.6040904@reub.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060701152258.bea091a6.akpm@osdl.org>



On 2/07/2006 10:22 a.m., Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Jul 2006 20:14:55 +0200
> Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no> wrote:
> 
>> I  just got mm5 up, and it has the same problem as mm4.
>> Raid-1 does not work. I used 2.6.16 to resync my raids,
>> and booted into 2.6.17-mm5.
<snip>
>> As we see, the md devices are assembled, then the filesystems are
>> mounted and swap turned on.  Then all three md devices fail a 
>> partition at the same time.  Somehow, I don't believe that
>> is correct. ;-)
>>
> 
> I assume this is still the broken-barriers bug.  Thanks for all the help on
> this, guys.  More is to be asked for, I'm afraid.
> 
> I've prepared a tree which is basically 2.6.17-mm5, only the git-scsi-misc
> and git-libata-all trees have been omitted.  It's at 
> 
> http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/2.6.17-mm5-no-sata-scsi.bz2
> 
> (That's a diff against 2.6.17)

Works.

> If that kernel works, then the next step is to test
> 
> http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/2.6.17-mm5-no-scsi.bz2
> 
> which is 2.6.17-mm5 without git-scsi-misc, but with git-libata-all.

Works.  I'm running it now and it looks to be all fine (including the 
workaround/fix for MSI)

In both cases I rebooted twice with each kernel to be sure it wasn't a one-off.

This then must point to git-scsi-misc being implicated, if not the source.......

Reuben

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-07-02  4:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20060701175444.958D6E00608B@knarzkiste.dyndns.org>
2006-07-01 10:35 ` 2.6.17-mm5 Andrew Morton
2006-07-01 11:08   ` 2.6.17-mm5 Reuben Farrelly
2006-07-01 11:51     ` 2.6.17-mm5 Andrew Morton
2006-07-01 12:31       ` 2.6.17-mm5 Reuben Farrelly
2006-07-01 13:06         ` 2.6.17-mm5 Brice Goglin
2006-07-01 17:00           ` 2.6.17-mm5 Greg KH
2006-07-01 18:03   ` 2.6.17-mm5 Ralf Hildebrandt
2006-07-01 18:14   ` 2.6.17-mm5 dislikes raid-1, just like mm4 Helge Hafting
2006-07-01 22:22     ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-01 22:52       ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-01 22:58         ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-02  4:43       ` Reuben Farrelly [this message]
2006-07-02  6:09         ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-02  5:13       ` Reuben Farrelly
2006-07-02 13:53         ` James Bottomley
2006-07-02 14:28           ` Grant Wilson
2006-07-02 15:06             ` James Bottomley
2006-07-02 15:43               ` Grant Wilson
2006-07-02 19:07                 ` Helge Hafting
2006-07-03  6:52                   ` Reuben Farrelly
2006-07-02  3:51     ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]   ` <20060701142419.GB28750@tlg.swandive.local>
2006-07-01 21:30     ` 2.6.17-mm5 Andrew Morton
2006-07-01 22:26       ` 2.6.17-mm5 James Bottomley
2006-07-01 22:32         ` 2.6.17-mm5 Neil Brown
2006-07-01 22:56           ` 2.6.17-mm5 Jeff Garzik
2006-07-02  0:10             ` 2.6.17-mm5 James Bottomley
2006-07-01 22:29       ` More RAID / SATA / barrier problems [ Re: 2.6.17-mm5 ] Neil Brown
2006-07-01 22:54       ` 2.6.17-mm5 Jeff Garzik
2006-07-27 21:02       ` 2.6.17-mm5 Ming Zhang
2006-07-02 10:03   ` 2.6.17-mm5 Andy Whitcroft
2006-07-02 10:14     ` 2.6.17-mm5 Andrew Morton
2006-07-02 10:40       ` 2.6.17-mm5 Andy Whitcroft
2006-07-02 11:14         ` 2.6.17-mm5 Andrew Morton
2006-07-03  0:47   ` 2.6.17-mm5 Theodore Tso
2006-07-03  7:32   ` 2.6.17-mm5 Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44A74F0C.6040904@reub.net \
    --to=reuben-lkml@reub.net \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=grant.wilson@zen.co.uk \
    --cc=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.