From: Erez Zilber <erezz@voltaire.com>
To: Ishai Rabinovitz <ishai@mellanox.co.il>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Receiving a SCSI response after abort task was sent
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:47:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44A7CE8E.1010106@voltaire.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060702132231.GA10030@mellanox.co.il>
Ishai Rabinovitz wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 01:51:51PM +0300, Erez Zilber wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a question about aborting tasks: when an initiator sends "abort
>> task" to the target, it is possible that the target will send a SCSI
>> response for the same task before receiving the abort task (I guess that
>> the target won't send a task management response for the abort task).
>> What should the initiator do with the SCSI response? Is the host that
>> issued the abort task willing to receive a SCSI response for that task?
>> Is it willing to receive only a task management response for the abort task?
>>
>> This message was also sent to ips mailing list.
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>>
>>
>
> In my opinion the initiator should work with the response and call the
> done callback of this SCSI command.
> This is the way we implement it in SRP: When we get a response for the task
> we set a bit indicting that this command was done.
> In the code that sends the task management and waits for response, we check
> after getting the response if this flag is set. If the flag is set we call
> the done callback. If it is not set, we set the result of the command to
> DID_ABORT.
>
>
>
Did you find any ref for this in SAM3? The only thing that I was able to
find there is that a target that receives an "abort task" has to send a
task management response even if it has already sent a SCSI response for
that task.
Thanks
Erez
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-02 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-02 10:51 Receiving a SCSI response after abort task was sent Erez Zilber
2006-07-02 13:22 ` Ishai Rabinovitz
2006-07-02 13:47 ` Erez Zilber [this message]
2006-07-02 15:14 ` Ishai Rabinovitz
2006-07-02 15:54 ` James Smart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44A7CE8E.1010106@voltaire.com \
--to=erezz@voltaire.com \
--cc=ishai@mellanox.co.il \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.