From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 11:01:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44A809E1.4040001@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1151862663.3111.27.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> There is a good answer to that question, and that is, the kernel is the
>> special case. It DOES make sense to let the distribution set the
>> default to whatever they think the end user should use for applications.
>
> yeah.. but it's called "CFLAGS environment variable" :-)
>
Absolutely not. Setting a CFLAGS environment variable has an effect
which is at very best unpredictable when dealing with a great span of
applications. Setting a CC environment variable is actually safer in
many ways, but even that is cantankerous.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-02 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.iPhEst5K48JbrGWRr3l3/GEBesY@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.iffnN5wM1UwqtCYhmqLAkGCMC2o@ifi.uio.no>
2006-07-02 17:31 ` 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail' Robert Hancock
2006-07-02 17:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-02 17:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-02 18:01 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
[not found] <fa.WuLfTz/aICPisBh2gZXGQmS9xvs@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.LW8cO+QP5MhBZ9HST2AOy+N/e6o@ifi.uio.no>
2006-07-02 4:26 ` Robert Hancock
2006-07-01 21:09 Miles Lane
2006-07-01 21:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-01 21:25 ` Miles Lane
2006-07-01 21:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-01 22:37 ` Miles Lane
2006-07-01 22:56 ` Miles Lane
2006-07-01 23:06 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-07-01 23:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-01 23:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-01 23:34 ` Miles Lane
2006-07-01 23:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-02 3:01 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-07-02 3:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-02 4:05 ` Miles Lane
2006-07-02 4:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-02 6:12 ` Miles Lane
2006-07-02 7:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-02 17:07 ` Miles Lane
2006-07-02 17:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-02 17:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-02 17:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-02 17:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-02 18:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-03 5:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-03 13:07 ` Miles Lane
2006-07-03 15:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44A809E1.4040001@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.