From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cathryn Mataga Subject: kissattach/kissnetd versus ptyq ttyq and ptmx/pts Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 00:38:14 -0700 Message-ID: <44AB6C66.4050000@junglevision.com> References: <20060623130355.9211a397.washer@trlp.com> <44AB00AC.7000708@junglevision.com> <620c90570607041948l150297b6ue70236ee277d5ce8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <620c90570607041948l150297b6ue70236ee277d5ce8@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org In my original Linux ham radio setup, I had the following... /sbin/kissnetd -f 1064 /dev/ptyq3 /dev/ptyq4& sleep 4 /sbin/kissattach -l /dev/ttyq3 lb1 192.168.0.2& /sbin/kissattach -l /dev/ttyq4 lb2 192.168.0.3& for creating the loopback device. Seems that in Fedora 4 ptyq3 and ttyq3 don't exist anymore. I tried using MAKENODE ptyq3 and ttyq3 to create these device files, but I don't think they're working? I get this error. kissattach: open: No such device or address I've been googling the pseudo terminals for Linux and it seems that the new way is with ptmx/pts and ptyq3 and ttyq3 are the old style. But I'm not sure, will kissattach works with these? Or is there a way to get ptyq3 ttyq3 working in Fedora 5? What's the right way to go about this, these days?