From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH] please kill santa-claus Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 17:49:04 +0200 Message-ID: <44ABDF70.2010705@netfilter.org> References: <20060630153802.GA27351@phoenix.home.spootnik.org> <44ABDBB4.5010605@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, Pierre-Yves Ritschard Return-path: To: Patrick McHardy In-Reply-To: <44ABDBB4.5010605@trash.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Patrick McHardy wrote: > Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote: > >>While running our home-brewed firewall scripts the output was broken by >>a weird message spewed by the libipt_iprange extension: >> "hoho" (sic) >>I wonder why that is, it seems not too many people noticed or use >>src-range inversion which is the feature that triggers this friendly yet >>surprising message. >>If there's a specific reason (which I haven't found in TFA or google) >>please let me know, otherwise please consider this one-liner: >> >>--- extensions/libipt_iprange.c.orig Fri Jun 30 17:34:05 2006 >>+++ extensions/libipt_iprange.c Fri Jun 30 17:34:21 2006 >>@@ -73,7 +73,6 @@ >> check_inverse(optarg, &invert, &optind, 0); >> if (invert) { >> info->flags |= IPRANGE_SRC_INV; >>- printf("hoho\n"); >> } >> parse_iprange(optarg, &info->src); > > > LOL :) Applied, thanks. This is Jozsef's :D -- The dawn of the fourth age of Linux firewalling is coming; a time of great struggle and heroic deeds -- J.Kadlecsik got inspired by J.Morris