From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: masquerade & ipsec Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 18:51:11 +0200 Message-ID: <44ABEDFF.5010005@trash.net> References: <44A6FDDE.8050805@seclark.us> <44ABDC15.9050606@trash.net> <44ABE469.7000001@seclark.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Stephen.Clark@seclark.us In-Reply-To: <44ABE469.7000001@seclark.us> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Stephen Clark wrote: > Patrick McHardy wrote: > >> You can use the policy match to exclude the packets that should >> be handled by IPsec from masquerading. Or simple do it by >> address. >> >> >> > Thanks for the response. > > I figured out how to do during the time between my post 7/1/06 and when > it showed on list 7/5/06 ( can anyone tell me why it takes so long for > post to the netfilter-devel list, when I post to linux-kernel it shows > up within a few minutes ). As a non-subscriber your posts are held until the list moderator approves them. Usually he's pretty quick. > When I worked for Data General we used call this the UTF ( Universal > Time Filter ) hopefully > the customer had figured out his problem by the time we got back to him. :)